Collaborative Governance (Intranet Politics Part II)
by Toby Ward — Part I of the Politics of Intranet Ownership highlighted one of the biggest hurdles blocking the typical intranet or portal from reaching its potential success: politics.
The need to resolve political and ownership issues has driven the
demand for a defined governance model, a structure outlining the
ownership and decision-making process. In Part I we examined
decentralized and centralized models. The emerging and more common
model in medium to large-scale organizations with enterprise intranet
or portals is a collaborative or federated model.
Collaborative Model
The up-and-coming next generation model of intranet governance is
collaborative, most often taking the form of a cross-representative
steering committee representing the major functional stakeholders in
Communications, Human Resources, Operations, IT and business units.
This model is most successful when the committee is championed by one
or two key executives, often the CIO, the head of Communications, or
HR. Instead of no owner, or one single owner, a collaborative team
governs the intranet through the application of policies, standards and
templates. This committee is typically responsible for the direction,
vision, prioritization of projects, conflict resolution and final key
decisions as it relates to the intranet.
Melcrum Research’s survey1 of 500+ intranet managers found that
the collaborative or steering committee approach is now the most common
model, and a shared thread amongst leading, successful intranets:
67.5% of companies have a steering committee, intranet council, or
similar, responsible for the development of the intranet
-
steering committees have on average between 6-10 individuals
-
79.3% have IT representatives
-
75.9% have internal communicators
-
65.2% have corporate communicators
-
51.7% have HR representatives
-
43.1% have marketing representatives
-
The study reveals that these steering committees or councils
generally meet monthly and are focused mostly on:
-
intranet mandate and vision
-
business objectives
-
policies and standardization
-
project prioritization
-
trouble-shooting and conflict resolution
Case Study: Sun Life Financial
When Canadian insurance firm Sun Life Financial merged with
another large insurance firm, it established the Sun Life Online
Communications Steering Strategy Council to guide the development of a
new, worldwide employee portal.
"We wanted to break down communications barriers that can
sometimes exist between a head office and national operations," says
Cheryl Ficker, Manager, Corporate Affairs, responsible for Sun Life's
online communications strategy. “The main driver for establishing a
council was to break down the barriers that existed between the
corporate group (head office) and the various operations of the
business."
Politics and the issues of
control, ownership and standards go hand-in-hand with intranet
management and perhaps these issues more than any other have driven the
requirement for defining governance models.
Ficker says the Council members are also the intranet's key
ambassadors and advocates, and continue to be, as the Council enters
its third year.
"The stakeholders are very passionate about their work, and often
view their efforts as personal achievements. It's helpful to have
diverse views and opinions at the table to ensure buy-in at the start,
and over the longer-term.”
One detractor of the collaborative model is the committee approach
to decision-making, which can be far slower and more bureaucratic than
under the centralized or decentralized model.
However, the steering committee serves as a vehicle for conflict
resolution that provides a forum for minimizing the politics of
ownership. Finally, the collaborative model ensures different
stakeholders think about the greater needs of the organization rather
than just their specific functional silo and leads to the development
of over-arching standards and policies. This cannot be over
emphasized!
"There is no doubt the Council was the way to go in terms of
establishing a forum for best practices, knowledge sharing and
collective evolution," says Ficker. "Through the Council, members have
established solid, meaningful and trusting relationships. At any time,
any member can pick up the phone and connect with their colleagues
internationally to brainstorm, share a story or ask a question."
Politics and the issues of control, ownership and standards go
hand-in-hand with intranet management and perhaps these issues more
than any other have driven the requirement for defining governance
models. As IBM’s Lister says, “The key thing is hassle elimination.” A
governance model will likely never eliminate intranet politics, but it
may just reduce the number of hassles for over-worked intranet
managers.
[1] “Survey data: Management of the intranet and issues
companies face” – Melcrum Research Report, Managing and Developing
Intranets for Business Value, 2001.
Toby Ward, a former journalist and a regular e-business
columnist and speaker, is the President of Prescient Digital
Media. For a website or intranet evaluation, or for a copy
of the free white paper, Finding ROI, please contact us directly.